Information for Authors

We invite you to publish articles in the scientific journal "CULTURE AND EDUCATION: SCIENTIFIC AND INFORMATION JOURNAL OF UNIVERSITIES OF CULTURE AND ARTS", included in the list of leading scientific publications published in the Russian Federation, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of doctor and candidate of science in pedagogy, cultural studies, philosophy should be published.

The article should have scientific novelty, reflect the main results of the author's research, correspond to the general direction of the journal and be interesting to a wide range of the Russian scientific community.

The article may contain (if necessary) a minimum of tables, formulas and graphic dependencies. The article must be completed with a conclusion (conclusions). All abbreviations and scientific terms should be disclosed. Should not be abused Internet sources. When using them, it is necessary to give references in accordance with the rules for designing the bibliographic apparatus of scientific articles.

Publication Requirements

The journal accepts for publication articles that have not been published before. Not earlier than one year after the publication of an article in our journal, the author may publish this text or its fragments in other publications.
The article should have scientific novelty, reflect the main results of the author's research, correspond to the general direction of the journal and be interesting to a wide range of the Russian scientific community.
The journal is categorically against illegitimate borrowings, manipulation of citation and falsification / fabrication of data. The author of the manuscript bears full responsibility for its content and is obliged not to make changes in the manuscript aimed at bypassing the algorithms of systems for checking for illegitimate borrowings. In this regard, the reason for refusal to consider the article is the artificial increase in the percentage of originality identified by the editorial board (masking of borrowings, generated text).
The article may contain (if necessary) a minimum of tables, formulas and graphic dependencies. The article must be completed with a conclusion (conclusions). All abbreviations and scientific terms should be disclosed. Do not abuse Internet sources. When using them, it is necessary to give references in accordance with the rules for designing the bibliographic apparatus of scientific articles.
In the structure of the article, it is necessary to exclude the names of the following headings: introduction, purpose, objectives, methods, relevance, main results of the study, obtained results of the study, conclusion — this design is incorrect in our journal and serves as a reason for refusing to consider and publish the submitted material.

1. The text is typed in the Microsoft Office Word editor, the font is Times New Roman, the point size is 14, the spacing is 1.5.

2. The length of the article is from 23,000 (from 12 pages) to 40,000 characters, including spaces. The length of the article includes only the text (from 12 pages), excluding the abstract and the list of references.

3. The list of literature is located at the end of the article in alphabetical order, bibliographic descriptions in the list are drawn up in accordance with GOST 7.05–2008, references in the text of the article are given in square brackets. The number of sources in the bibliographic list is not less than 10 and not more than 30. References are not required.

4. Attached to the article:

a) abstract (100-250 words) in Russian and English, as well as key words to the article in Russian and English (8-12 words);

b) information about the author in the following order — the full name of the author (authors) in Russian and English, as in the passport or driver's license; academic degree, academic title, position, place of study or work (in the nominative case), city, country. All data are duplicated in English. Separately, a contact phone number is indicated, and an e-mail address is required;

c) mandatory is an indication of the UDC, grant or state task;

d) mandatory is an indication of the specialty code (together with the name of the specialty) for which the article is submitted.

5. Articles are accepted in the electronic version on the e-mail of the editors: vestnik-mguki@mail.ru

a) All articles are double-blind peer-reviewed and published free of charge. The editorial board reserves the right to select materials, as well as the ability to make changes to the title and text of the article in agreement with the author. The position of the editors may not coincide with the point of view of the authors.

b) Prior to reviewing, the originality of the article is checked in the Anti-Plagiarism system. The journal accepts articles with a degree of originality of the text of at least 75%. Quotations take up no more than 20 percent of the text. Self-quoting is limited to the necessary minimum (no more than 10 percent of the text in the form of a paraphrase with a link to the source). Matches no more than 2%.

c) Authors are responsible for the content of publications. The author is responsible for the accuracy of reproduction of names, quotations, formulas. An article, after its approval by the editorial board of the journal, can be prepared for publication up to six months. The contract form is sent to the author after the editorial board decides to publish the manuscript.

d) The author must inform the editorial board of the journal about all his works and the works of his co-authors, which intersect in subject matter with the article submitted to the editorial office and are under consideration in other publications.

When presenting the main results of his research, the author must be in the legal field, i.e. its publication should not in any way violate the Law of the Russian Federation of December 27, 1991 N 2124-1 (as amended on April 18, 2018) "On the Mass Media".
The editorial staff of the scientific journal "Vestnik MGUKI" in its editorial policy is guided by the principles of publication ethics, developed on the basis of Russian and international standards. From the authors offering their materials for publication in the journal, the editors expect the following principles to be observed:

originality of the research;

providing reliable results of the work done, the absence of false statements and erroneous data;

an objective discussion of the significance of the study;

inadmissibility of personal and disparaging remarks and accusations against other researchers;

obtaining permission to use (reproduction) of other people's materials, tables, images and the obligatory indication of the author of these materials and / or the owner of the copyright to these materials;

submission of information from confidential sources only with their permission;

representation as co-authors of all participants who have made a significant contribution to the research and writing of the article; approval of the final version of the work by all co-authors and their full agreement with its submission for publication;

expression of gratitude to other colleagues who are not the authors of this article, but who influenced its creation;

disclosing potential conflicts of interest (providing information about employment, consulting, stock ownership, receiving royalties, providing expert opinions, patent application or patent registration document);

a clear indication in the text of the manuscript of information about the grants received, other sources of funding for the study, about all other forms of support, i.e. facts that can be perceived as having an impact on the results or conclusions presented in the work;

immediate notification of significant errors or inaccuracies found in the publication and interaction with the editor in order to correct errors as soon as possible or withdraw the publication, timely correction of errors and inaccuracies identified by the reviewer or editor.

Example of Abbreviations of Positions and Degrees

DSc in Philosophy — Doctor of Philosophical Sciences
CSc in Philosophy — Candidate of Philosophical Sciences
DSc in Philology — Doctor of Philological Sciences
CSc in Philology — Candidate of Philological Sciences
DSc in Pedagogy — Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences
CSc in Pedagogy — Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences
DSc in Cultural Studies — Doctor of Cultural Studies
CSc in Cultural Studies — Candidate of Cultural Studies
DSc in History — Doctor of Historical Sciences
CSc in History — Candidate of Historical Sciences

Academician

Postgraduate student

Postgraduate at the Department of

Doctoral student

Undergraduate student

Faculty

Dean

Department

Honorary Worker of Higher Education

Lecturer at the Department of

Senior Lecturer

Professor

Professor at the Department of

Associate Professor

Associate Professor at the Department of

Head of the Department of

Junior Researcher

Senior Research Officer

Head Scientist Researcher

Department Head (UK) / Department Chair (US)

Example of a List of References

Monographs:
Glazkov M.N. Mass Libraries in the Context of the Cultural and Historical Path of Russia in 1921–1941: a monograph. Moscow: MGUKI, 2004. 236 p.
Teaching Aids, Textbooks
Abramov K.I. History of Librarianship in Russia: textbook. allowance. Part 2. Moscow: Liberea, 2001. 160 p.
Collections of Articles
Blum A.V. Sunset of Glavlit. How the System of Soviet Censorship Collapsed: Documentary Chronicle 1985-1991. // Book: Research and Materials. Collection 71. Moscow: TERRA, 1995. P. 168-187.
Journal Articles
Glazkov M.N. Domestic Library Science and Education (1964–1982) // Culture and Education: Scientific and Informational Journal of Universities of Culture and Arts. 2018. №2. pp. 70–81.
Abstract
Simonova I.F. Formation of the Image of a Specialist in the Socio-Cultural Sphere in the Cultural and Educational Space of the University: author. dis... cand. ped. Sciences. St. Petersburg, 2014. 24 p.
Digest of Articles
Suminova T.N. Art Manager in the System of Culture and Art Management // State Cultural Policy and Management in the Sphere of Culture: Sat. scientific Art. intl. scientific-practical conf. Moscow: MGIK, 2018, pp. 58-71.
Electronic Resource
Lefebvre A. Social Space // Emergency Reserve. 2010. No. 2 (70): URL: http://urbanica.spb.ru/?p.4122

Manuscript Review Procedure

The procedure for reviewing manuscripts submitted for publication in the journal "Bulletin of the Moscow State University of Culture and Arts"

Review is carried out in two stages:
The first stage — primary review. All scientific articles submitted to the journal, before publication, are subject to verification for compliance with the requirements established by the editorial board, during which the conformity of the article to the profile of the journal, the requirements for formatting, the presence of necessary components (abstract, keywords, information about the author with an e-mail address in Russian and English) is determined. The text of the article is checked in the Anti-Plagiarism system. Primary review is carried out by the executive editor and deputy editors-in-chief.
The second stage — scientific review ("double-blind review"). If formal requirements are met, the article is sent for mandatory review to two specialists (members of the editorial board or invited specialists). Reviewers are not informed about the authorship of the reviewed materials. Reviewers are warned that the manuscripts sent to them for examination are subject to copyright norms, copies of unpublished materials are not made, and the content of articles is not subject to disclosure. Authors of articles are not provided with information about the reviewers.
The editorial board reserves the right to reject articles:

not corresponding to the profile of the journal;

that have received negative opinions of reviewers;

formatted in violation of the rules;

that do not have the necessary components (abstract, keywords, information about the author with an e-mail address in Russian and English);

containing gross errors and inaccuracies in the bibliographic description in the list of references;

published in other editions, including Internet media, in the same volume and with the same title;

containing incorrect borrowings (plagiarism).

The review period, as a rule, cannot exceed eight weeks. In some cases, an increase in the review period is allowed due to the need to involve experts on the subject of the article. The review must indicate:
- whether the title of the article corresponds to its content;
- whether it meets modern achievements in the considered field of science (taking into account its relevance and scientific novelty), as well as a reasoned conclusion on the possibility of publication.
The reviewer can give recommendations for revision and regarding its publication in the journal.
Authors of rejected articles are sent a reasoned refusal without indicating the name of the reviewer. The editorial board does not enter into further correspondence with these authors.
An article that needs revision is sent to the authors with the comments of the reviewer or a member of the editorial board. The authors must take into account all comments made during the review and editing of the article, answer each of the comments and indicate the place in the text where changes were made. The changes made by the author must be entered into the electronic version of the text and returned to the editorial office within the specified time frame.
After revision, the article undergoes re-reviewing, based on the results of which the editorial board decides on the possibility of publication.
Multiple revisions of articles are not allowed: if after the revision of the article by the author it was not possible to eliminate the comments, then this article is removed from consideration and rejected in the prescribed manner.
The final decision on the publication of the article is made by the editor-in-chief, and, if necessary, by the editorial board.
Reviews of received materials are stored in the editorial office for at least 5 years together with the editing of manuscripts.
Refusals for publication are provided at the request of the authors in the form of an official reasoned refusal. Copies of reviews are sent to state bodies upon receipt of a corresponding request by the editorial office of the publication.